A Swiss-backed risk curator that scores vault infrastructure on governance, oracle assumptions and liquidity under stress before directing capital into it.
Clearstar is another entrant in the risk-curator category — it evaluates third-party vault infrastructure (Morpho, Euler, IPOR, Upshift and others) against a qualitative three-stage framework (filtration, boundary design, ongoing discipline) covering governance and timelocks, permission structure, oracle assumptions, and liquidity under stress, then directs depositor capital into the vaults it approves and manages ongoing risk parameters. Revenue comes from curator fees rather than a protocol-native spread, and Clearstar discloses those fees more granularly than most peers — different published rates by vault tier, generally in the low single digits to around 20% depending on the vault. Its corporate identity is genuinely more complicated than the marketing framing suggests: Clearstar's own legal notice names the operating entity as a Panama-registered company whose existence couldn't be independently confirmed in any public registry, while the "Swiss-backed" branding rests on a separate, real Swiss-registered entity that shares an officer with a regulated Swiss asset manager at the same address. The widely-repeated "roughly $1B AUM" figure most plausibly traces to that affiliated firm's historical (pre-2020) cumulative fundraising rather than any current Clearstar-managed total — no source states a current group AUM anywhere close to $1B, and Clearstar's own materials aren't fully consistent on whether the backer is a regulated asset manager or a family office.
Clearstar's actual on-chain curation history is shorter than its 2022 founding date implies: its first confirmed Morpho vault dates to March 2025, meaning roughly 16 months of real curator track record as of mid-2026 — shorter than Steakhouse's or K3's, closer to AlphaGrowth's or UltraYield's tenure as active curators. Where Clearstar stands out is fee transparency, publishing more granular per-vault rates than most of its peers, and it has a genuine, disclosed incident to point to: after an oracle-manipulation exploit drained roughly $49,300 from a Morpho market it curated in May 2025 (targeting a mispriced Aerodrome LP position), Clearstar published a detailed public post-mortem and covered the shortfall itself rather than leaving depositors to absorb it — a concrete data point in its favor that not every curator on this list has an equivalent to show. Against that, its risk-appetite framing doesn't always match its stablecoin-adjacent branding: its largest disclosed Morpho position is reportedly a Pendle principal-token position tied to a consumer-credit protocol flagged "no disclosure submitted" on Morpho's own risk tooling, and its Monad Euler cluster is reportedly dominated by a single volatile bridged asset rather than diversified stable collateral.
Clearstar's Monad presence is confirmed on-chain — a "Clearstar Reactor" cluster on Euler spanning AUSD, FXRP, USDC and USDT0 — but is essentially undocumented in any first-party announcement or press coverage, a notable gap compared to every other curator in this set, each of which has at least one dedicated announcement covering its Monad deployment.
Curation doesn't remove the underlying protocol's risk — depositors are still exposed to whatever smart-contract, oracle or bad-debt risk exists in the Euler vault Clearstar curates on Monad, regardless of Clearstar's own diligence process. There's also a curator-trust risk layered on top: Clearstar itself sets and can change risk parameters on curated vaults, so a lapse or compromise in Clearstar's own process is a single point of failure sitting above the base protocol. The corporate-identity opacity described above compounds this — with the operating entity's registration unconfirmed and its AUM claims resting on an affiliated firm's history rather than Clearstar's own current figures, depositors have less to verify about who's actually accountable than with a more conventionally documented curator.
Note: No token — like most curators in this category, Clearstar earns fees rather than issuing a governance token.
The picture is split: a real Swiss-registered entity exists and shares an officer with a genuine, regulated Swiss asset manager, but Clearstar's own legal notice names a Panama-registered operating entity that couldn't be independently confirmed in any registry. The "Swiss" branding rests on founder overlap, not a clearly documented ownership structure.
No entity currently operating as Clearstar has been shown to manage anywhere near $1B. The figure most plausibly traces to an affiliated Swiss firm's historical, pre-2020 fundraising total rather than Clearstar's current assets under management.
Yes, and it's publicly documented: an oracle-manipulation exploit on a Morpho market it curated caused roughly $49,300 in bad debt in May 2025. Clearstar published a detailed post-mortem and covered the shortfall itself rather than leaving depositors to absorb the loss.
Sources: Clearstar, Clearstar — risk curation methodology, Clearstar — legal notice, Post-mortem: Aerodrome cUSDO/USDC oracle manipulation — Morpho Forum
Last reviewed 2026-07-08. More Monad research.
Monad DeFi board · Markets · Swap on NullTerminal